Security scanning for AI-assisted builders
Find security gaps in your website. Prepare fixes with your AI coding tools. Recheck what you deploy.
Free website scan coming soon.
One evidence trail. A clear handoff to your coding assistant.
Exported Quick scan and recheck of our own owner-authorized test site, shown under a fictional alias. Not customer data.
Your pages do not set a script policy.
/Low severityYour pages do not ask browsers to remember HTTPS.
/Low severity0 of 2 header checks passed · 1 of 7 areas assessed
Coverage, not score. Unassessed areas remain unknown.
/.You stay in control. No tool or deployment is launched.
From a recorded recheck of our own test site
Quick scan → comparable recheck ·
Earlier evidence · /
Recorded recheck
No longer observed
Earlier evidence · /
Recorded recheck
No longer observed
0 of 2 → 2 of 2
Header checks passedConfiguration presence, not overall security.3 of 3 scheduled configuration settings assessed. The sample has 2 completed weighted header checks. Earlier: 0 passed; recheck: 2 passed. A numeric score requires at least 5 completed weighted checks.
Request target: https://demo.example/
Content-Security-Policy: not returned
Finding ID: 4af59a3b7f93732e570d9456
Recheck: No longer observed
Strict-Transport-Security: not returned
Finding ID: 69345dca363b732777d97c71
Recheck: No longer observedThe owned fixture uses synthetic HTTP transport to represent HTTPS headers. The report pair was exported through the shared report contracts, then aliased and identity-redacted for this static presentation. The repair handoff illustrates the frozen guidance; it is not an exact exported brief. Missing headers alone do not establish exploitability. Intended access and application behavior were not tested. No overall safety claim is implied.
Request an invitation, then work from evidence to a repair and recheck.
Invitation beta
Ask for an invitation using the beta access link.
Invitation beta
Create your account after your invitation is confirmed.
Invitation beta
Choose Quick or Deep and confirm your authority to assess the target.
Invitation beta
Read what was observed, why it matters and what was not assessed.
Invitation beta
Take a scoped brief to your coding tool. Review and test the changes.
Invitation beta
After deployment, compare fresh observations on a compatible basis.
Evidence, within an authorized scope.
Invitation beta
Understand the configuration gaps that need your attention.
| Profile | Quick | Deep adds |
|---|---|---|
| Needs | Your attestation | Everything in Quick, plus ownership proof |
| Covers |
|
|
Not included: signed-in browser testing, form submissions or active exploitation.
Invitation beta · Limited access
Bring concrete evidence from a pinned snapshot into your repair discussion.
Not included: code execution or complete source-code coverage.
Planned
Application reviews connect the builder, business owner and reviewer around the intended use, recorded evidence and accountable human decisions.
A recheck does not approve an application. The decision stays with a person.
Interested for your team? Tell usA useful finding gives you evidence you can act on. See what was observed, what it may mean and where coverage stops.
Scan what you’re authorized to assess. Quick scans need your attestation; Deep scans add ownership proof. Rechecks stay inside the same authorized scope.
Understand what was observed before deciding what to change. Facts, possible impact and unchecked areas stay separate. Unchecked is never shown as safe.
A Configuration score appears only after at least 5 weighted checks complete, so a couple of headers can’t earn a grade. It summarizes checked settings, not overall security. A repair statement isn’t fresh evidence.
Building with MCP servers and coding agents? We’re adding static checks for tool permissions, exposed secrets and risky configuration.
Build fast with AI without shipping blind.